You are a senior official within the Ministry of Human Resource Development, entrusted with overseeing educational policies and initiatives. The Ministry is currently implementing a nationwide program aimed at improving access to quality education for underprivileged children in rural areas. Extensive planning has been undertaken to identify regions with the greatest need and to allocate resources accordingly. The program emphasizes inclusivity and aims to narrow the gap between urban and rural educational institutions.

However, during the program’s implementation phase, it surfaces that certain private educational institutions, including those affiliated with influential politicians, are receiving preferential treatment in terms of funding and regulatory exemptions. These private schools, often serving affluent urban students, are benefiting disproportionately from government funding while neglecting the dire needs of rural schools lacking basic infrastructure and resources.

Further investigation reveals that several politicians with vested interests in these private schools have exerted undue influence on resource allocation, diverting funds away from the intended beneficiaries of the program. Additionally, conflicts of interest arise when it is discovered that some Ministry officials have familial ties or financial stakes in these favoured private institutions, raising questions about impartiality and transparency in decision-making.

In this scenario, you, as a senior official, are approached by some high-ranking politicians who offers you a lucrative position under present government. They hint at the potential for substantial financial gain and career advancement if you cooperate, but also suggest that resistance could lead to professional consequences.

1. What are the ethical dilemmas involved in the given case study?
2. Critically evaluate all the available options at your disposal.
3. What should be the right course of action?